I’m going to throw some facts your way in the first couple chapters and we’ll
discuss it more later when we can pull it all together.
There are stalactites and stalagmites
in caves and other rock formations that scientists claim took millions of years
to develop. Stalactites are formed by the deposition of calcium carbonate
and other minerals, which is precipitated from mineralized water solutions. The
corresponding formation on the floor underneath a stalactite is known as a
stalagmite. Given enough time, these formations can meet, resulting in
formations known as columns. In Thermopolis, Wyoming there is a huge
formation of stalactite that developed over 100 years where a 1 inch water pipe
was left running for 100 years. Only 100 years! There are many
places where man made tunnels are forming stalactites and stalagmites. It
happens a lot faster than they say.
The Grand Canyon and other canyons supposedly took millions
of years to be carved by the rivers running through them. Mud from the
Mississippi river is dumped into the Gulf of Mexico at the rate of 80,000 tons
per hour. Where is the mud from the Colorado River as it carved the Grand
Canyon for millions of years? Also, when does a river that comes back in
on itself, changing direction, somehow in the past was a rushing river that
carved a canyon so deep? They have changed their minds about the Grand
Canyon many times already. National Geographic Kids, March 2003; The Grand
Canyon is just a baby! Science News, September 2000; The Grand Canyon is
not as old as once thought! They are realizing it didn’t take millions of
years to carve the canyons; it took a lot of water, not a lot of time.
Science News, June 2004; Gorges were carved surprisingly fast!
The Geologic Column is an evolutionary column that you will
find in many textbooks. It doesn’t exist anywhere in the world but it is
taught as fact (Earth Science magazine 1989). The Grand Canyon is supposed
to represent the deepest exposed “strata” layers in the world. It’s
interesting that less than half of the strata are actually seen and it’s not in
the order science says it is and there are gaps where there are no strata from a
presumed era. All over the earth, depending on where you go, there are
strata layers missing, they are in completely different orders from one place to
another, and some places have certain layers that others do not. There are
layers, certainly, but the “column” is not evident or complete as it is taught
anywhere on the planet.
Another interesting fact is that they have found fossilized
trees that are vertical through the layers of strata. Think about this for
a second. A dead tree stood for millions of years in the same place and
fossilized while the world changed and evolved around it and layers of strata
were built up around it. For millions of years??? Some places have
trees fallen over, some at an angle, some straight up, all fossilized and
extending through several layers of “strata” that took millions of years to lay
down. Hello? When can a dead tree lay there for millions of years,
exposed to the elements, and not rot away?
And what about the layers of Diatoms found in the ocean
floors? These are microscopic life forms that accumulate on the floor of
bodies of water and are said to accumulate at one inch per 1000 years as they
die and float to the bottom. They use this accumulation to determine the
age of things found. It’s very interesting that they found an 80 foot
whale standing on its tail completely surrounded by Diatom layered around it.
A whale stood on its tail for millions of years while Diatoms died and built up
They’ve also found entire buried forests 200 feet below
ground all over the earth, but they have never found a meteorite below the top
layer. Scientists are baffled by this.
They’ve found 90 foot plumb trees frozen in the ice 600
miles north of the Arctic Circle. They have ripe plumbs and healthy
leaves, all frozen.
They’ve found Mammoths and many other animals frozen in
place with food still in their mouths, frozen in stride.
Jellyfish are made mostly of water, and when they get washed up on shore, they quickly dry out.
Within a very short time there is nothing left. Yet huge jellyfish fossil graveyards have been found,
requiring rapid deposition, burial, and fossilization. Just the fact that we have jellyfish fossils is
remarkable evidence that the Great Flood occurred.
How about the fact that since man has begun recording time,
the earth’s rotation slows by about one second per year? The spinning of
the earth is slowing down. A year from today, it will take one second
longer for the earth to spin in one complete rotation. If you do the math,
and I did, that means that 30 million years ago there was one revolution about
every second. The sun would flash across the sky every second. The
earth would have been like a strobe light… on, off, on, off, on, off… 300
million years ago there were 10 revolutions per second… onoffonoffonoff…
3 billion years ago there were 100 revolutions per second. 15 billion
years ago (the big bang) earth was spinning at 500 revolutions per second.
The earth would have been spinning so fast that there would be no difference in
light at any time. Gravity would have had no effect and, without proving
the physics, I would bet that things literally would be flung from the surface
of the planet at that speed of rotation from the centrifugal force.
Science cannot explain these things or many other things.
Is the earth really as old as they want us to believe? We’ll talk more
about this later…
Carbon dating is another interesting study. Did you
know that they base it on totally unproven “facts”? Yes, today we can see
the rate of decay on Radiocarbon or Carbon 14 (known as Carbon dating) and we
expound upon the findings of short-term testing to “prove” that things are
billions of years old. We have to assume that scientists know all about
the variables involved, that some scientists are wrong in supposing that there
was variation in the intensity of cosmic-ray formation and that others were
wrong in supposing that there were fluctuations in the original C-14 content.
Carbon dating assumes that the rate of C-14 decay has been a constant and has
always been exactly the same rate that we find it to be today. Funny thing
is that they tested an ancient structure at Durrington Walls in England, that
they knew was 1500 years old, but the Carbon dating “proved” that it was
actually 2500 years old! I stress that this "proof" was actually provably
wrong. Some other examples of abnormal C14 results include testing of recently
harvested, live mollusc shells from the Hawaiian coast that showed that they had
died 2000 years ago and snail shells just killed in Nevada, USA, dated in at
27,000 years old. A freshly killed seal at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica, yielded a
death age of 1300 years ago. A petrified miner’s hat and wooden fence posts were
unearthed from an abandoned 19th century gold hunter’s town in Australia’s
outback. Results from radiocarbon dating said that they were 6000 years old. So,
why does everyone believe such a farce? If it is so inaccurate on such a
relatively new sample, how can we assume that it won't be exponentially deviate
on a much older sample? It is a belief, not a science.
Here's an interesting page where scientists in the UK are
concerned about this very subject:
Specifically, I found this
statement very interesting: “For radiocarbon dating to be reliable scientists
need to make a number of vital assumptions. Firstly, Dr Libby assumed that C14
decays at a constant rate. However, experimental evidence indicates that C14
decay is slowing down and that millennia ago it decayed much faster than is
observed today. Secondly, the theory behind C14 dating demands that there is the
same rate of cosmic production of radioactive isotopes throughout time. The
industrial revolution has belched hundreds of thousands of tons of carbon gases
into the atmosphere increasing the C12 ratio and atomic weapons testing have
increased neutron levels. Thirdly, the environment in which the artefact lies
heavily impacts on the rate of decay. For example, C14 leaches at an accelerated
rate from organic material saturated in water, especially saline water.
Fourthly, for C14 to test accurately the artefact must have been protected from
contamination. Organic matter, being porous, can easily be contaminated by
organic carbon in groundwater. This increases the C12 content and interferes
with the carbon ratio.”
The biblical flood
detailed in the book of Genesis caused this type of testing to be completely
unreliable. Why do the scientists ignore these facts? There are many other
things that scientists can't explain which are explained very easily when the
flood is considered in the reasoning process.